Which of the following is best to use to tailor CM requirements on DoD contracts?

The best choice for tailoring Configuration Management (CM) requirements on Department of Defense (DoD) contracts is EIA-649-1, which specifically addresses configuration management requirements within the context of defense contracts. This standard outlines the essential principles and practices necessary to implement effective configuration management processes tailored to the unique needs and specifications of defense projects.

EIA-649-1 provides a comprehensive framework for establishing configuration management practices that are consistent with DoD needs and regulations, making it particularly suitable for this context. Its focus on requirements relevant to defense contracts ensures that organizations can effectively manage changes while meeting the stringent standards and accountability required in defense environments.

In contrast, other standards like MIL-HDBK-61A provide general guidance on configuration management but may not specifically target DoD contracts, reducing their direct applicability in this scenario. EIA-649B, while also addressing various aspects of configuration management, is more of an update or revision and may not be as directly aligned with the requirements of specific defense contracts as EIA-649-1. EIA-836 focuses on interoperability and data exchange, which, while important, does not directly tailor CM requirements in the same way EIA-649-1 does, making it less suitable for the purpose outlined in