Which of the following is a necessary part of the ECP submission process?

In the engineering change proposal (ECP) submission process, providing a justification of the change is essential. This justification articulates the reasons for the proposed modifications, including the benefits, anticipated impacts, and necessity for the change. It helps stakeholders understand the value of implementing the changes and how they align with project goals or requirements.

A solid justification can also address potential risks and cost implications, ensuring that decision-makers have all the necessary information to approve the ECP. Without a well-reasoned justification, it becomes challenging to gain approval for changes, as stakeholders may lack confidence in the proposal's merit or implications.

The other options, while potentially relevant in specific contexts, do not represent necessary components of the ECP submission process. Public stakeholder meetings may be beneficial for gathering feedback but are not obligatory in all situations. Analyzing previous ECP outcomes may provide insights for future proposals, but it is not a required step in every submission. Finally, final contract negotiation might occur later in the process after an ECP has been approved, but it is not a part of the submission phase itself.