Which factor can lead to the rejection of an ECP?

High costs and significant risks are crucial factors that can lead to the rejection of an Engineering Change Proposal (ECP). In the evaluation of ECPs, decision-makers assess both the financial implications and the potential risks associated with implementing the proposed changes.

When an ECP exhibits high costs, it signifies that the resources required to implement the change may not provide a sufficient return on investment. Significant risks further compound this issue, as they can jeopardize project timelines, quality, or safety, ultimately affecting the overall success of the project. Decision-makers tend to prioritize proposals that demonstrate cost-effectiveness and manageable risk levels. If either of these aspects—cost or risk—is deemed excessively high, it raises concerns about the feasibility and sustainability of the proposed change, leading to the likelihood of rejection.

In contrast, clear justification and regulatory compliance, minimal risk factors, and support from all stakeholders are elements that typically contribute positively to the acceptance of an ECP, making the proposal more compelling and less likely to be rejected.