Which element is NOT typically included in the evaluation criteria of an ECP?

Evaluation criteria for Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs) focus on fostering effective decision-making by assessing factors that impact the technical and operational integrity of a proposed change. Among the common elements included in these criteria are justification, schedule impact, and technical feasibility.

Justification assesses the reasons behind the proposed change, including benefits, objectives, and alignment with project goals. Schedule impact evaluates how the proposed change will affect the project timeline, ensuring that deadlines can still be met or identifying necessary adjustments. Technical feasibility determines whether the change can be implemented within the existing technical constraints and resource capabilities.

On the other hand, team member preferences are subjective and not typically factored into the criteria for evaluating an ECP. While team dynamics are important for the overall functioning of a project, individual preferences do not objectively contribute to the evaluation of the proposal itself in terms of its technical merit or project impact. Therefore, including team member preferences does not align with the focused, objective nature of the evaluation process for Engineering Change Proposals.